


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LooseKannon.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loosekannon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loosekannon.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Insights On The Timely And The Timeless&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:16:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Market Radio and the (Un)Fairness Doctrine-3rd edition by Mike Nolan</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/free-market-radio-and-the-unfairness-doctrine-3rd-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3655#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>LK,

As I&#039;ve said before, the &quot;Dems&quot; don&#039;t really want this (just a few of the less intelligent ones) - this is simply the Fair and unbalanced battle cry - &quot;The Sky Is Falling&quot; -  misdirection - don&#039;t fall for it.  The Fairness Doctrine isn&#039;t taken seriously enough to ever make it into committee, let alone into a bill, or for that matter hit an FCC docket.

And, if in some weird chance that it did come to pass - and somehow was enforceable - would it matter?  Is there enough media consumption under FCC regulation to make a difference? - especially if we had some sort of &quot;balancing&quot; act?

It will never happen.  Rush and his buddies just fan the flames every so often.  The socialist are coming!  They want Grandma DEAD!  No one wants government run health care! They want to take away your Medicare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LK,</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, the &#8220;Dems&#8221; don&#8217;t really want this (just a few of the less intelligent ones) &#8211; this is simply the Fair and unbalanced battle cry &#8211; &#8220;The Sky Is Falling&#8221; &#8211;  misdirection &#8211; don&#8217;t fall for it.  The Fairness Doctrine isn&#8217;t taken seriously enough to ever make it into committee, let alone into a bill, or for that matter hit an FCC docket.</p>
<p>And, if in some weird chance that it did come to pass &#8211; and somehow was enforceable &#8211; would it matter?  Is there enough media consumption under FCC regulation to make a difference? &#8211; especially if we had some sort of &#8220;balancing&#8221; act?</p>
<p>It will never happen.  Rush and his buddies just fan the flames every so often.  The socialist are coming!  They want Grandma DEAD!  No one wants government run health care! They want to take away your Medicare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Grid &#8211; The VIDEOKAST by Barry Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/the-grid-the-videokast/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3690#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I like it a lot.
I read the post the other day, but with the addition of sight andf sound it makes more of an impact.
There are so many things that need fixing and so little money to do it.
Cut the damn defense budget and use that money for a real jobs program.
Cut more of the damn defense budget and use that for education.
Cut foreign aid and use that for healthcare.
Its all about priorities and we have ours in the wrong order.
I can see why the tea partiers want a clean sweep in Congress. All those guys are bought and paid for by special interests. But why should we think that new guys (or gals) comingin would be any different?
We really do need massive changes to financial reforms for the electoral process. But who&#039;s going o be brave enought to do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it a lot.<br />
I read the post the other day, but with the addition of sight andf sound it makes more of an impact.<br />
There are so many things that need fixing and so little money to do it.<br />
Cut the damn defense budget and use that money for a real jobs program.<br />
Cut more of the damn defense budget and use that for education.<br />
Cut foreign aid and use that for healthcare.<br />
Its all about priorities and we have ours in the wrong order.<br />
I can see why the tea partiers want a clean sweep in Congress. All those guys are bought and paid for by special interests. But why should we think that new guys (or gals) comingin would be any different?<br />
We really do need massive changes to financial reforms for the electoral process. But who&#8217;s going o be brave enought to do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LK Called It by Free Market Radio and the (Un)Fairness Doctrine-3rd edition &#124; LooseKannon.com</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/lk-called-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Market Radio and the (Un)Fairness Doctrine-3rd edition &#124; LooseKannon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?page_id=3079#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>[...] LK Called It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LK Called It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commenting on Cynicism by Mike Nolan</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/commenting-on-cynicism/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3610#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one I heard from a friend:  Limit donations to the geographic area of office.  Only residents of the district/state could contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one I heard from a friend:  Limit donations to the geographic area of office.  Only residents of the district/state could contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cynicism Is The New Real by Oscar the Observer</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/cynicism-is-the-new-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar the Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3591#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>The contributions to his campaign were negligible, but it was clear (from the article) that his very, very close friend owns 1100 payday lenders.  There is a culture of corruption in Congress, for sure.  It&#039;s evidenced every day.  Corker at first denied that he was trying to negotiate (with Dodd) an exclusion for payday lenders from the bill.  And there&#039;s a Congressional culture of falsely (or at least inaccurately or incompletely) characterizing  support or resistance to legislation, from the electorate, as empirical facts.  

The NY Times also reported, earlier this month, or at the end of February, that the GOP leaders went to Wall Street to get campaign contributions to the party, and were somewhat rebuffed.  Then Mitch McConnell and Boehner visited Wall Street, and received commitments for GOP campaign contributions.  Want to speculate on what they traded for the dollars?   Watch whether ANY Republican will vote for the bill reported out of Dodd&#039;s committee.  And the Democrats who heavily rely on Wall Street contributions will also vote against it.  Cynicism?  It&#039;s too mild a term.  &quot;Disgust&quot; is much closer to the truth.

We can reduce the disgust by passing legislation that forbids any Representative or Senator from being a lobbyist, directly or indirectly, for 10 years after he/she leaves office and legislation that prevents votes or appointments by one legislator (the Bunning/Shelby ploy) or by less than a majority of the Senate; and a constitutional amendment that: (i) increases the terms of Representatives to 4 years, (ii) caps Senators&#039; terms at 12 or 18 years,  (iii) creates an independent panel to establish congressional districts, so that Democrats are not always re-elected to the House from Democrat-gerrymandered districts and Republicans from Republican-gerrymandered districts or the same legislators automatically winning their primaries and elections in their districts, and (iv) makes the McCain-Feingold provisions constitutional.

But the legislators creating the cynicism and disgust are not interested in any of the above, because the mantra of Congress is &quot;Don&#039;t vote against your own self-interest; just tell the public that they don&#039;t want it and don&#039;t support those changes, because if you say that long enough and loud enough it brainwashes a majority of voters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contributions to his campaign were negligible, but it was clear (from the article) that his very, very close friend owns 1100 payday lenders.  There is a culture of corruption in Congress, for sure.  It&#8217;s evidenced every day.  Corker at first denied that he was trying to negotiate (with Dodd) an exclusion for payday lenders from the bill.  And there&#8217;s a Congressional culture of falsely (or at least inaccurately or incompletely) characterizing  support or resistance to legislation, from the electorate, as empirical facts.  </p>
<p>The NY Times also reported, earlier this month, or at the end of February, that the GOP leaders went to Wall Street to get campaign contributions to the party, and were somewhat rebuffed.  Then Mitch McConnell and Boehner visited Wall Street, and received commitments for GOP campaign contributions.  Want to speculate on what they traded for the dollars?   Watch whether ANY Republican will vote for the bill reported out of Dodd&#8217;s committee.  And the Democrats who heavily rely on Wall Street contributions will also vote against it.  Cynicism?  It&#8217;s too mild a term.  &#8220;Disgust&#8221; is much closer to the truth.</p>
<p>We can reduce the disgust by passing legislation that forbids any Representative or Senator from being a lobbyist, directly or indirectly, for 10 years after he/she leaves office and legislation that prevents votes or appointments by one legislator (the Bunning/Shelby ploy) or by less than a majority of the Senate; and a constitutional amendment that: (i) increases the terms of Representatives to 4 years, (ii) caps Senators&#8217; terms at 12 or 18 years,  (iii) creates an independent panel to establish congressional districts, so that Democrats are not always re-elected to the House from Democrat-gerrymandered districts and Republicans from Republican-gerrymandered districts or the same legislators automatically winning their primaries and elections in their districts, and (iv) makes the McCain-Feingold provisions constitutional.</p>
<p>But the legislators creating the cynicism and disgust are not interested in any of the above, because the mantra of Congress is &#8220;Don&#8217;t vote against your own self-interest; just tell the public that they don&#8217;t want it and don&#8217;t support those changes, because if you say that long enough and loud enough it brainwashes a majority of voters.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dumbing Down Dumb by Barry Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/dumbing-down-dumber/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3573#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>The Falcon is correct.
It is truly mind-boggling that our so-called leaders cannot see what is going on in this country.
So much money is spent on so much worthless crap and so little is spent on important things.....just because the politicians only look to save their jobs because of their huge egos. They are afraid to take principled stands.
Easy to see why so many now say &quot;a pox on both their houses&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Falcon is correct.<br />
It is truly mind-boggling that our so-called leaders cannot see what is going on in this country.<br />
So much money is spent on so much worthless crap and so little is spent on important things&#8230;..just because the politicians only look to save their jobs because of their huge egos. They are afraid to take principled stands.<br />
Easy to see why so many now say &#8220;a pox on both their houses&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let &#8216;Em Eat Cable by ABC and Cablevision Miss A Golden Opportunity &#124; LooseKannon.com</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/let-em-eat-cable/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>ABC and Cablevision Miss A Golden Opportunity &#124; LooseKannon.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3535#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>[...] Night has fallen and both sides swerved to avoid a collision in their game of corporate media chicken that I wrote about this morning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Night has fallen and both sides swerved to avoid a collision in their game of corporate media chicken that I wrote about this morning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Funny or Die&#8217;s Presidential Reunion by My Sedentary Life</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/funny-or-dies-presidential-reunion/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>My Sedentary Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3521#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>P.S. At about :50 in the video there is a shot of Obama&#039;s night stand with what appears to be a Chicago Cubs mug. Obama is a Chicago White Sox fan. Ron Howard is slipping, I guess. But more importantly, I don&#039;t want any Curse of the Cubs to rub off on Obama. He&#039;s facing enough challenges already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. At about :50 in the video there is a shot of Obama&#8217;s night stand with what appears to be a Chicago Cubs mug. Obama is a Chicago White Sox fan. Ron Howard is slipping, I guess. But more importantly, I don&#8217;t want any Curse of the Cubs to rub off on Obama. He&#8217;s facing enough challenges already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Funny or Die&#8217;s Presidential Reunion by LK</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/funny-or-dies-presidential-reunion/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>LK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3521#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;funny stuff, but there &lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;em&gt;an &lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;invisible hand of the market&quot; &lt;em&gt;although perhaps not exactly as referred to above.  it&#039;s nicknamed the PPT, or Plunge Protection Team, and its official title is  &quot;President&#039;s Working Group on Financial Markets&quot;.  we&#039;re a free market like a free range chicken who gets its head cut off is free.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>funny stuff, but there </em><strong>is</strong><em> </em><em>an </em><em></em><em>&#8220;invisible hand of the market&#8221; </em><em>although perhaps not exactly as referred to above.  it&#8217;s nicknamed the PPT, or Plunge Protection Team, and its official title is  &#8220;President&#8217;s Working Group on Financial Markets&#8221;.  we&#8217;re a free market like a free range chicken who gets its head cut off is free.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Common Sense Fails At Justice Department by LK</title>
		<link>http://loosekannon.com/common-sense-fails-at-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>LK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loosekannon.com/?p=3472#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter.  Agree with your Devil&#039;s Advocate thesis and their potential behind the scenes effectiveness.  However, if they&#039;re lead prosecuting counsels and they lose, the Obama administration takes another punch to the gut and they&#039;re doubled over already. I&#039;m operating on my thesis that what used to be called cynical is now an accurate gauge of what&#039;s real.  Stay in Touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter.  Agree with your Devil&#8217;s Advocate thesis and their potential behind the scenes effectiveness.  However, if they&#8217;re lead prosecuting counsels and they lose, the Obama administration takes another punch to the gut and they&#8217;re doubled over already. I&#8217;m operating on my thesis that what used to be called cynical is now an accurate gauge of what&#8217;s real.  Stay in Touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
